| |
"Bruce Hietbrink" <bnh@chem.ucla.edu> writes:
> I'd think a .studios group would be best. It looks like Lego is using the
> Studios line as an outlet for a few sets with a given theme when there are
> not enough for a whole new theme (e.g. 2 Spiderman sets). So a .monsters
> group (or a .spiderman group) might not be strong enough after no new sets
> are released, but a .studios group would continue on as they move to new
> mini-themes in the Studios line.
I agree. You can always make .studios.monsters or .studios.spider-man
(note the hyphen) later, if the need arises.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMAZING BUT TRUE: There is so much sand in northern Africa that if it were
spread out it would completely cover the Sahara Desert!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: studios group?
|
| (...) I'd think a .studios group would be best. It looks like Lego is using the Studios line as an outlet for a few sets with a given theme when there are not enough for a whole new theme (e.g. 2 Spiderman sets). So a .monsters group (or a (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
