Subject:
|
Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:15:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6058 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
| |
There might be some implied favoritism toward the yellow L if we count
this Todd & Suz
created image for anything.
But I was more just wondering and not necessarily suggesting a change in logo
orientation.
|
It’s a good question, Brendan. It’s been 8 years and I can’t recall exactly
what the decision process was, but I do recall we felt that certain
orientations looked upside down, while others looked right-side up. I think
we looked at 12 different coloring/orientation permutations before choosing
the final.
Somewhere on an old hard drive, I have about 20 Visio drawings tracing the
evolution of the logo, back in August 1998. It didn’t actually start out as
an “L”, but other (pre-block) logos in 1997 (which never saw the light of
day) did have an “L” and an “N”.
I’m really happy to see this whole thread...and everyone working together to
give feedback to Rene in a constructive way.
When a final rework is decided upon, Susanne and I will want to give our
input on certain subtleties of the way the logo is rendered (particularly
the coloring and the spacing), but I’m still very happy to see brainstorming
and cooperation. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) Nice, thanks for the illustration. (...) I can certainly understand the hesitation in thayt regard. (...) There might be some implied favoritism toward the yellow L if we count (URL) this Todd & Suz created image> for anything. But I was more (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
