Subject:
|
Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:22:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, John Neal wrote:
| |
It seems standard procedure that there needs to be a
“quiet” space around any logo
|
I agree with John about this. If the LUGNET logo must be in a box, it should at
least have more space around it. But I also still highly favor the larger,
non-boxed LUGNET logo from this draft.
On an only somewhat related note... the LUGNET logo is comprised of three
interlocked L’s, which I always assumed stand for LUGNET, but the way the logo
is positioned, the L’s are backward. Anybody know why they didn’t flip the logo
around so the L’s are forward? Or are they not supposed to be L’s? Guess this
could really only be answered by Todd and Suz.
-Brendan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) I really like this draft as well, because of the lack of boxes. The only problem with not having a box around it this draft is that the logo gets diluted by the colors passing behind it. On my own somewhat related note... the actual LUGNET (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) I'm really starting to like it! One thing about the LUGNET logo. I work with a lot of corporations and dealing with their logos. It seems standard procedure that there needs to be a "quiet" space around any logo, which is often determined by (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
