Subject:
|
Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:47:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5902 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, John Neal wrote:
| |
Here is a little logo
study for you to help make your point:
|
Nice, thanks for the illustration.
| |
Verrry eenteresting. I’m not sure how kosher it is to be talking about
manipulating the LUGNET logo,
|
I can certainly understand the hesitation in thayt regard.
| |
but FWIW, I like the one with the red L
standing up straight.
|
There might be some implied favoritism toward the yellow L if we count
this Todd & Suz created
image for anything.
But I was more just wondering and not necessarily suggesting a change in logo
orientation.
-Brendan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) It's a good question, Brendan. It's been 8 years and I can't recall exactly what the decision process was, but I do recall we felt that certain orientations looked upside down, while others looked right-side up. I think we looked at 12 (...) (18 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) I really like this draft as well, because of the lack of boxes. The only problem with not having a box around it this draft is that the logo gets diluted by the colors passing behind it. On my own somewhat related note... the actual LUGNET (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
