Subject:
|
Re: Hmm, another suggestion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:13:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5101 times
|
| |
| |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 06:40:52PM +0000, Frank Filz wrote:
> Aren't logged on members already associated with a posting setup?
Actually, I wasn't sure. After a bit of digging, it seems that members
are associated with *one* posting setup - I assume after going through
the posting setup while logged in. I'm not sure if that association is
actually verified as part of the posting setup or not - one of the
people who do that would know (Larry? Todd? Is there anyone else?).
If it is verified, then I think it should be usable for this purpose.
Of course, you won't be able to cancel your old posts unless you
re-setup again. Not ideal. I think it would be much cleaner to
associate the posting setup with a member (instead of the other way
around) - but that would require that manual verification step (which
might already be happening!).
Did that help at all?
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Hmm, another suggestion
|
| (...) Not sure I undestand the question, but what from I get of it, I think Todd would have to answer. I have a favour to ask (again) Can we have one new/revived suggestion per post please rather than 3 paragraphs that have to be read closely to (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hmm, another suggestion
|
| (...) Good point. Hmm, did we capture the suggestion that we should have logins for non-members so they can benefit from some of the post controls? (...) Aren't logged on members already associated with a posting setup? Frank (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|