 | | Lugnet Color Table
|
|
Today while helping someone via the LDraw help desk I refered to them to the color chart located at (URL) so that they could get the ldraw color id for silver chrome, which is 383. However, I soon discovered that there is a "?" for the silver chromo (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) I would probably suggest 2 bits tagged on the post: 1) Author has prevented highlighting/spotlighting 2) Admin has prevented highlighting/spotlighting The effect of the bits would actually be pretty hidden. Instead of preventing people from (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | New Train Club Newsgroup Request
|
|
Would it be possible to create the following newsgroup and have it listed on the Trains Organizations page ((URL) lugnet.trains.org.spltc Thanks, Ray SPLTC www.spltc.org (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) This is something I would support, though it might be hard to do from the NNTP or SMTP interfaces (unless there is some flag that could be put in the post or a header). It might be nice to be able to do after the fact also, but verification (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) Yes, I picked this up too. (...) Yes, Larry I had offered the ability to prevent or remove any highlight to my own posts. This would give me a bit of control, and send message to others about my highlighting desires, but still prevents abuse (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, I was asking for the ability to prevent or remove any highlighting only from my own posts. I guess I felt it would be only the author's perogative (i.e. I wouldn't have the ability to lowlight anyone else's post.). (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the elaboration, Steve. LUGNET DID have such a system, and it was not uniformly positively received. This has been alluded to in other replies as well. A suggestion to again allow both negative and positive weighting should not be (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Steve Bliss wrote: <snip> (...) Well then that,s different, isn't it? The ability to choose whether my post should be able to be highlighted or not--that's a pretty neat little thing... Would that 'non highlighting' flag (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) LUGNET history note: we already went through this. When highlighting was first available, it was possible to give a negative rating to messages. This feature was abused/misused almost immediately -- or at least, people perceived that it was (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) It's a good idea on paper. The issue will arise when Group A has more people than Group B--Group A can always make sure nothing from Group B ever gets highlighted just by everyone in Group A 'lowlighting' the post. I mean if we (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
