 | | Public comments of sets in database
|
|
Is it possible for LUGNET administrators to cancel or edit vulgar comments that people write in the field that is publicly viewable in the set database? The reason I ask is this: (URL) guy's description of the price for that set in France just makes (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
(...) (URL) My old Post> I'm one of the ones that brought this up before. And I'd argue that I think it needs to come up again. Especially if more and more people chime in that they are getting annoyed at seeing our "highlighted" stories over-run (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Inventory Suggestion
|
|
I have a suggestion that would make keeping one's personal inventory up-to-date easy and automatic. Could we have a feature on Bricklink so that orders for whole sets could be added to one's LUGNET set list (which would then be added to Peeron's My (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
Snip... (...) I, too, do not like the color change. However, I believe that a ‘letter’ to TLC regarding such would have been better presented on a website with a form that users could complete, sans debate. Anyhow, that’s not why I am writing (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
Hey, I do think there are some potential administrative "solutions" (assuming that all agreed that this was a problem). The weightings of .announce posts or .off-topic could be adjusted up- or downwards to increase MOC discussion. The idea of being (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
(...) That's exactly why I've started doing it (and have avoided, no matter how annoyed I get, making any sort of response to the .color or letter-based nastiness). Lead by example (well not so much 'lead' as 'participate') (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
(...) And that's another anticrossposting argument I have.... it circumvents weightings. For the record Ben has apologised for his inappropriate excessive crossposting. (...) I think that's a valid concern. But I DO think people spotlight good mocs (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) I don't remember if I did this for last year, but here's this year's. If there's interest, I can post last year's as well. Same limitations as before, deal with it :) Notice that Larry is still the loudest mouth, excep that he posted from 4 (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
(...) Currently, there are (URL) variable spotlight weights> provided so that some newsgroups are prefered over other newsgroups. The hoped for effect is that MOCs will be on the mainpage more than fruitless discussion. You'll notice that several (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Response highlighting
|
|
(...) Just more coding suggestions: I think that in the "someday" category when/if personal skip-filters are employed to the spotlight, perhaps there could be an opt-in setting that prevents replies from making it to the spotlight list. In response (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
