 | | Smiley Icons?
|
|
OK, doh! After composing this, I just did a search on "emoticons" and sure enough, this was (URL) discussed> a while ago. What ever happened to it? Hi All, Smiley icons seem to be all the rage on many other forums on the net, but we don't have any (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Papenfuss wrote: <snip> (...) Wow. And I thought I was arrogant. ;) Dave K (22 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) quite amazing how this is revolving around how a lugnet admin actually did not ignore you, replied to your postm, and made you feel like a responsible person of society, and you blew up at him and judged his intelligence to that of a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) lol, whatever Todd. Look - everybody has brain farts - Leonard just happend to have a very large one here (I assume). I am not, and did not say he is like that in general - just on that one point. There is a difference between these: But my 3 (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) That was really a not cool thing of you to just say. (...) The extent to which any given group is "on-topic" (e.g., LEGO-focused) or "off-topic" (e.g., non-LEGO) is not a 0 or 1 but a fuzzy value in-between. For example, many posts in the .loc (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) good ;) But that is not what you said I was asking for. So I am glad it is NOW yes, but I don't think it is "still yes". (...) I am sorry you took that as disrespectful. It was not the intention. More on this below (1). (...) See, I would (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Yup. I heard you say that loud and clear. (...) Still yes. (...) It shows disrespect to post a direct reply to a random and innocent message in a group when you think that the group itself is misplaced, and not the message. It also shows (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek wrote: (snip) (...) I just wanted to drive home my point one more time before I leave this topic. I see a definite distinction between LUGNET the LEGO resource and LUGNET the AFOL community. That's not to (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Thank you, Lar. JOHN (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) This seems like a good summary of your position on this topic. Do you agree? If not, is there a better one? Is there anything significant on this proposed change that you feel hasn't been brought to light yet? If this is a good summary and (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
