 | | Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
|
(...) Thanks for listening and working so diligently to improve this great website. John Hansen (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Well done, Todd!
|
|
Just tried out the new email confirmation, and I'm impressed! Well done! ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
(...) I have a feeling we'll find that it won't keep the really persistent trolls out, but we'll see. ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Peter McLoone asked these things: (...) Glad - absolutely. (...) Yes, it really is. Overdue, perhaps, but good things take time. (...) Yes, it is. It is a regular annoyance and inconvenience to us now, but after a while, we will (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
Daniel Crichton <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:GF8M7o.L2y@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) there's (...) Lugnet (...) I would also really like this solution, even though I am NOT a paid up lugnet member. If everyone still had access via (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
(...) Which is still the really scary and unfortunate fact. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
|
(...) Oh. Hmm. Yes, excellent idea. Or spool it into a processing queue that gets processed frequently and in a serial way. :-) -- Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com> (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
(...) but since you just sent two posts, you expected to get to auth messages... if you get one tomorrow morning, you'll probably be curious to see why... also, true, some people will automatically reply to auth messages sometimes... but if it's not (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message . (...) browser (...) Excuse me for just suggesting this option in another mail. I don't agree. A very simple way is to make the header look like this: Message_id 54dfDF7_&2532))sdrt4325ds which still is readable (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
|
|
Another idea? It is much faster just to reply to the sent message. Many mailinglists use this system. Opening a page takes quite some time, while sending the mail can be done in just a few seconds. Sonnich Brad Hamilton <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
