|
|
 | | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
| (...) The general public might think an adult site devoted to a childrens' toy a bit suspect anyway. Who knows what they think about the Bionicle websites. (...) The Brick Testament better watch out, or readers of the source material. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
|
| (...) This isn't really strictly true; there are a lot of discussions in the .loc groups which have nothing to do with LEGO (for example, lodging, sightseeing, local politics), and pretty much anything and everything goes in the .org.xx.yyyyy groups (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
|
| (...) Whatever occurs outside of 'off-topic' is supposed to be 'on-topic' to the focus of the site (LEGO). If this group itself is _not_ 'off-topic,' than all discussion should somehow revolve around LEGO. So far I haven't seen this thread tie in to (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | skip-filter
|
| (...) .off-topic is only filtered out by default. You're free to add it back in by changing your personal preferences: (URL) => .admin.nntp] (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
| (...) What a great couple of groups for people from NAMBLA or other pedophiles and the like to cruise since they would blend in with the adults already using the site. Time to get rid of that quote on the home page about it being "the friendliest (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp) !
| | | | | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
| (...) I have to say that I have seen some people opposing this move who can be legitimately interpreted as mean-hearted, and yes, that's sad. What I think is equally sad, though [1], is that people can't seem to respect that many want to enjoy their (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests
|
| (...) that, but she thinks its strange the number of heated arguements we have here. Granted, she is biased by the fact that she's married to someone fairly reactionary, so she see's a skewed version of things. However, even if I were a mostly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
| (...) Bravo! I think this is a good move. I am not sure who will be posting in each of these, but i appreciate the efforts of the admin to create them. However, I am saddened by the number of people who disagree with this move. While I was (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests
|
| (...) Agree! (...) I'd guess not, until it really becomes requested. To be honest, I'd probably prefer to see a .christian newsgroup before I saw a .men newsgroup, just because ".men" speaks to roughly 95% of the LUGNET population (going by (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests
|
| (...) I think it would be as useful for men to have their own newsgroup as it would be for women. I don't understand the use for any of them, since I believe the LEGO experience is not influenced by sexual identity, but hey, if we're gonna have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
