 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) man, oh man, have you crystalized my thoughts! i agree with everything you have just said. lugnet is just another facet of e-society (or society, for that matter) that the homosexual agenda has permeated (as if we are not bombarded with it (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Something can make it to the front page with only one spotlight? Sure: as long as those other 2,499+ members aren't spotlighting something else. If you don't want to see something on the front page, then spotlight something else! Spotlight (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) [SNIP] (...) Like you really have to point out to anyone you're a socialist. I figured that out already from the way you're telling everyone to sit down, shut up and live with it. And apparently you don't read my posts to thoroughly - my last (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) LUGNET currently has 2,500+ members. I've seen many times where a post has gotten on the LUGNET front page with just a single person spotlighting it. One person spotlights a gay post, and everyone who comes to LUGNET for the first time could (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: SNIP I think that it's pretty cool we get a Kids news group, seeing as how I'm a kid. I think it's fine if your gay or whatever, but I think my Mom would get mad at me if see me looking at the LGBT group. (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|