 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: <SNIP> (...) By taking the premise of this site and adding specific adult themed groups, you've opened the door for what so many parents cringe about the internet. Now, thanks to this unilateral decision, we (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) It's a good thing then, that we have a group of police who carefully watch what's posted where, and correct and admonish as appropriate. Cheers Richie Dulin (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
Hello! (...) With posts like yours: certainly. Bye Jojo (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
Todd, just a non-partisan comment here to say thank-you for making this post. Whether they agree or disagree with its content, I hope all the readers appreciate the fact that you provided some kind of "official statement". As a long time (albeit (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Well, if Todd didn't implement the group, and there was an uproar about that, I'd chime in and say *exactly* the same thing. But you don't know that about me.(1) It's Todd's backyard--if he says that the group gets added, the decision is made (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
|
|
(...) I can't say I agree-- by saying that, you're absolutely forcing LUGNET into a position of choosing a religion by arguing that something that's *unreligious* is a religion in and of itself. Hence, you could argue that nothing ever was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) [SNIP] (...) [SNIP] (...) That right Dave, only one group us getting attention - nobody asked people their opinions or requested the other seven. 'Leave it alone/Life goes on/get over it.' - you libs (ie your West Wing marathon clues me in on (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP As these new groups now exist, I feel no need to continue the debate about them. I do want to point out the fallacy that Todd espouses here about being religious-neutral and religious beliefs (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
A big public thank-you to you, Todd, and the LUGNET Transition Team. I have subscribed to people.lgbt as a mailing list--my first! [LDrawPart 3004:373] -Teddy p.s. I guess I have a Yellow Brick Road to build now! (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Well said Todd. (...) May peace be unto you as well. Ray (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
