 | | Re: RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
(...) If they're minifig scaled, can't they go in .Town, or maybe .modelteam if they're more detailed? I'm just thinking that .build.aircraft might be a bit specialized compared to stuff like .build.military, which encompasses military troops, (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
There is no appropriate place on LUGNET for Aircraft MOC's. If they are military planes, then they can be posted in lugnet.build.military, but for commercial or private aircraft models there is no single best place. I propose lugnet.build.aircraft (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK23q.1ruD@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) used too! Mike (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) Actually the .overview files weren't the culprit (which is good, because I was about to go insane trying to figure out why, if they were). The culprit was that when I applied this fix retro-actively to old articles: (URL) made backup/archive (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Todd Lehman <todd@lugnet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) I think sunday or monday (18. or 19. May). But as I synchronized the newsgroups yet the problems with "not downloaded" news are gone. Has anybody else noticed (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) OK, that's consistent with the quoted-printable fix.[1] Quoted-printable tended to be more used in some areas and not in others. (...) Thanks for the list, Mike. Question: Is it fixed now? --Todd [1] (URL) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) Ah, OK. I get the same thing by telnetting to port 119. Thanks. (...) OK, this group is correct. The last article number is 188, and there are 186 articles present, because 2 in this group were cancelled. (...) OK, this group is incorrect. The (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
Ok, it seems you just fix it. This is what I get now: GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13087 1 13106 lugnet.loc.it "estimated" < "last": OE is fine with it. Thanks. BTW: why is "estimated" <> "last" - "first"? -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hello Todd, (...) fix (...) seems you just did it because now I don't have that error anymore. Thank you ;) Carsten (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK0u1.1Do7@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) and (...) matching (...) fix (...) What is wierd is that it isn't affecting all groups. For example, lugnet.admin.nntp works fine. I am having (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
