|
| |
|  
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
 | | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) Yeah, that's pretty much what I thought. Hey, Todd, I've been meaning to ask this for a while now- is there any way you can adjust the skip-filter to allow for killfiling users as opposed to groups? eric (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) Not necessarily. The logic is both simple and sound: 1) Arguments have been made. 2) Todd has made a decision. 3) Further arguments have been made. 4) Todd has basically said under no circumstances is he going to change his mind. It's not so (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) shown (...) Agreed. I've got two memorable passwords right now. One happens to be taken from a sentence that denotes what I think of the current level of security, which makes it VERY memorable for me, anyway. :-) So I would agree. no need to (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) Isn't this a discussion group? How does this discussion go against the terms of use? I don't think it was a good idea either, and nobody can make you implement anything, but why can't he discuss it, that's what I don't understand. /Eric McC/ (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) Let's do. Todd has stated his position on this many, many times, and has shown little desire to change his mind. Dragging it back out would only foment trouble and breed bad feelings (not to mention the smaller matter of raising the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:FuF26n.KsJ@lugnet.com... (...) I was bemused by Eric's statement to a certain extent. I'm sure there is every possibility he may be 100% correct, but I just wondered what he had based it on? (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) For the record, I raised this issue once. My other messages in the thread related to the nature of the debate and not the issue itself – or at least that was my intention. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) not (...) The fact that an issue results in high traffic means that it needs fixed - not swept under the carpet. The merits of my suggestion aside, some pretty weak logic is being applied here. Scott A (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| (...) The fact that an issue results in high traffic means that it needs fixed - not swept under the carpet. The merits of my suggestion aside, some pretty weak logic is being applied here. Scott A (...) fangled (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| Another usefull feature of being able to have multiple passwords, and to retire them at your leisure is that for those weird random times when you have a good reason to let someone else use your account (perhaps Todd needs to log on as you to debug (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| | Re: Member Password Center
|
| Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:Fu3oAt.I3I@lugnet.com... (...) Lets not. I was thinking about this yesterday. Is the answer to this not to have two "memorable" passwords, rather than one that looks like a missile launch (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.170)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.169)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.169)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.169)
|
|
| | Re: PW validation
|
| (...) Ya, sorta... But not so much two different states of logins as two tiers of passwords which would both be required (only if you wanted it that way) before you'd be considered actually logged in. In other words, you could give two passwords (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
password
(score: 0.169)
|
|
| |
|
password
(score: 0.168)
|
