General Discussions about LUGNET : Search Results: password


Administrative / General / Search Results: password

Results 21 – 40 of about 520.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
In lugnet.dear-lego, Brad Justus wrotes: (...) I've been cogitating on this from a technical standpoint and I think I have come up with a general workable solution, all things considered. I agree that if something can be done, it should be done. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) I think you might be onto something there. Ignoring for the moment the issues of someone possibly wanting to change their code word later or needing their memory refreshed, what you're suggesting is quite feasable. (...) Hmm, if the code word (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) Yeah, this whole thought of calling it "snooping" seems ridiculous to me. How many times have you had to manually edit URLs you've come across because they just didn't plain work until you "hacked" away at them? If it's world-readable and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

password
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) Not necessarily. Does (URL) contain links to all the users /~user directories? In 90% of the cases, in my experience,. not. Same for ISPs. So 90% of the web is not intended to be seen by your logic. Security through obscurity is no security at (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) No, you're defining webserver differently. I'm not going to bother quibbling semantics with you. (...) No. "in a place public can get to" != publically available != published. The three of them often co-incide, but do not necessarily do so. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

password
(score: 0.843)

		Lugnet Password
Um, btw, Todd? Why can't we change our lugnet password? Or is there a way and I'm just being blind? :) Dan (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.841)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) I am starting to think that this password checker, in its current form (which I'd like to see left accessable as it IS useful) shouldn't actually block a password. It should tell me that "maybe this isn't a good choice" but it doesn't know (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

password
(score: 0.840)

		Re: Pulled off a snipe.
(...) Yah, I suppose pretty much anything you post anywhere on the internet that's viewable without a password has lost its confidentiality. Not sure what he meant by proprietary and "confidential" but what he posted certainly wasn't confidential (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.840)

		Re: New feature: Article rating
I really want the ability to set my own password. I've lost my password somewhere and don't have a prayer of remembering what it is. SO I can't rate my articles 100 and Todd's 0 until I either find it again or get my pw set to something easy for me (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.840)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) OK, here it is: (URL) summary: Type in a password and it tells you "pass" or "fail". First important question: Are there any bad passwords which this fails to reject? (If it rejects a seemingly good password, that's not necessarily a problem. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !!

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
I have a suggestion, you may want to test substitute things like "!" as a substitute for "l" or "i". Have you thought about vowels being dropped and K/c substitutions. I have a password which I would consider a worthless password the way you are (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Lugnet Password
(...) Haven't implemented that facility yet... --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:28:05 GMT "Larry Pieniazek" <lar@voyager.net> wrote concerning 'Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)': (...) heh, it might be interesting to see a log of the passwords... though I'm sure that Todd (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Member Password Center
(...) Cool, I just added a password I can actually remember. Some nitpicks, though: shouldn't the input fields be password fields instead of regular text fields (ie, asterisks instead of letters). Otherwise, there's not real point in retyping the (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) it got a "adequate". Sorry, I can't tell you what it is right now, though. Handy tool. Appreciate your making it available. ++Lar (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) LOL... that reminds me. My sis used to use a password for this game we had, she was just 4 and needed something she could remember, when all she knew to write was her name. But she didn't want something SO obvious (never mind that I helped her (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) OK, I've done more research into human factors of passwords and have crufted together[1] what I hope is a rather froody password checker. First, it's got a _moby_ database of more than 2.7 million words, names, phrases, numbers, and other (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: New feature: Article rating
(...) Probably there will be a way to set an additional password to use on top of the main password as a simple sign-in/sign-out layer, or to choose one of several machine-generated passwords. (...) By design, that is impossible. There is no way to (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Bummer -- that makes me suspect that it really truly is a horrible password then (as you surmised, and pointed out to your coworker). Yet it passed, which makes me nervous. Welp, if you someday are able to convince your coworker that this (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) It's my box, and it's going to a show, I was there when the password was set and I know it's not a very good one. But despite being the PM of the project I don't just want to stamp my foot and make them change the password, I'd rather provide (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.839)

More: Next Page >>