 | | Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?
|
|
(...) Use e-mail. A 2nd suggestion: I think it is time you stopped being "LUGNET policeman". Todd has made it clear the Dan is now the "head whacker" around here. Suz has already said she and Todd are stressed right now, why not just leave this well (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I appreciate what Larry is doing, and I do think it's a good thing that community members teach new people where to post. Please, don't place the burden of redirecting all these posts on me, since I will have no time left for other things (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Thanks Dan! I'm sure I speak for a lot of us when I say I want you to have time to code... your rate of feature-add on peeron just whets our appetite. (...) Better than it was before you spoke up but not a certainty. :-) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
Well if you think that support for vigilantes is what we need I shall watch with interest. However, I for one do not feel that the bickering which results is helpful to LUGNET. Do you? "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:Gpq6u2.E6o@lugnet.com... (...) I don't think anyone wants to put the burden on you for these types of posts. But I would like to see the climate change here so when people do correct others for (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I do not agree that we have a climate where people are being chastised. I've only really seen it happen to one person. (...) I think we need to be more subtle. I'm old enough to remember a phase of LUGNET where there was too much policing by (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Some of my thoughts: - I'm glad to see some acknowledgement that the "policing" needs to be done by more than just one or two (or three or four) admins. - With multiple people posting reminders, an advantage of posting over e-mail is less (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Or 2b. Poster receives 10--20 e-mail messages telling him that he's wrong (many probably more caustic than would have been posted in public) because no one is sure that someone has corrected him. 3b. Poster feels harassed. 4b. Poster gives up (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) I agree you have a point. But do you think the current system leaves users feeling any less harassed? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) This is a good idea. Is this something the curators (where they exist) can do? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Redirecting posts (was: Re: Are you looking for a 1592 Town Square - Castle Scene in MIB condition?)
|
|
(...) Being corrected in a public forum is somewhat disturbing to most people. On the other hand, getting one correction message is (I would think) less disturbing than getting many. The latter inadvertantly communicates a sense of the "in-group" (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
