 | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-2012012...ink.com... (...) His (...) can (...) opinion (...) So you can justify punishing someone for an opinion? I wouldn't approve of any racial slur being used, but that doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I think there's a fine line here and IIRC the ToS is deliberately ambiguous on it. users are enjoined (by the discussion group terms) as follows: " 4. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Only for expressing the opinion, I think. (...) But then why do you support the mandate against profanity? I've assumed the goal of these rules is to make LUGNET a place where adults can do their thing and still be a place that parents are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:Gor26t.98p@lugnet.com... (...) So, do you advocate a 'speech code' system for LUGNET? Careful, read this first: (URL) suggested reading - anything by Larry Elder. Look at it this way. I (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | Tim, I'm choping your note and reassembling because I think it's important... (...) I believe I detect a double standard in your rhetoric. Is it "pinning" something on you to identify the fault in your thinking? (...) For me, this isn't really about (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | ="Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:Goszrp.H3J@lugnet.com... (...) important... Ok. (...) though. (...) I don't believe there's a fault in my thinking. I will definitely examine my thinking, but at this point I still (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) While the trend in campus speech codes is disturbing, I don't think universities need to allow complete free speech. Universities need to provide an environment for education. If a person (or group of people) is being abused by the speech of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
