 | | Re: Spammers are harvesting here
|
|
(...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) You're right, we don't. Wierd. I thought some-one had said they were going to do it. Should I just email to "admin@lugnet.com" to add it? Are we happy enough with it as is to actually get it added? (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) Its not that really, look at the counterpart US page... (URL) are no links to ORG websites there. The links only show up when you go down one more level to the ORG newsgroup. For example: (URL) just looked like the VLC link on the general (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) In the case of NALUG, it's because we're lazy. We've got a homepage at: (URL) we haven't gotten around to informing the Lugnet admin of it... James (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
I am just wondering why there is a link to the VLC website from the CA org page... (URL) it isn't a mistake shouldn't all CA LUG's have a link there ;-). They do have a link on the VLC newsgroup page so that is right. Just thought it was wierd, Eric (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) I think this would be groovy, and I've got my own 0.02USD to toss in... 1. Choose a new newsgroup name carefully. My newsreader (Forte Agent) sorts my list of subscribed groups alphabetically. So "lugnet.spotlight" would get buried in the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) yah, just like that! :) now, we all have to wait two more years before anyone mentions this again! *grin* Dan (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Perhaps something like this? (URL) article is nearly two years old! Fredrik (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) yet (...) a (...) interesting idea... something like the server statistics, posting once a day to a group, listing the top stories? I think I like it :) Dan (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) This just sparked an idea... As an nntp user, the sportlights are almost invisible to me. Would it be possible to autogenerate a crosspost of some sort when a post makes the spotlight list? Just something to mull over... (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Thanks for proving my point for me, David. People use the database all the time, some more than others, but it still gets used. It's just less useful to me now that I've cataloged roughly 98% of my collection. -Dave (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) OMG, don't even say that! I'm using it so much it's hard to imagine what it'll be like without it! (...) Yep. (...) - David (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
Heh! I agree with both of you guys! BTW Larry, who made you LUGNET's policeman? You just wish you had as much creativity and talent as Eric. :-P (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
I agree with everything said here Eric, (...) Truth be told, I only saw this recently, a few weeks ago, I meant to pass on my congrats through e-mail but forgot completely, sorry. :-( (...) Amen! when I was just getting started with showing off my (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Actually, Kevin, I do remember...and thanks! The scans were incredibly useful to me at one time, as I'm sure they are useful to others now. I do check them from time to time, as I haven't memorized them yet. :) They were most useful in (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Of course I do. It would be nice to see scans for certain UFO sets that weren't there last time I checked. Personally, I don't care about new instructions. I care about new inventories. Printing complete sets of new instructions is a no- no. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Presumably you're clear on WHY Brickshelf doesn't go right to the very newest set and support that position, right? Someone asked that the very newest Harry Potter set instructions for Hogwart's Castle be scanned. Rather thoughtless of that (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Do you remember what it was like before the scan archive? If it's really not all that useful anymore I could take it down and save a few Mbit/s :) Seriously, the instructions and set inventories have very little functional overlap. Those (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET's address (in Belmont, MA) will discontinue in a few weeks. -Suz (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
