 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Thanks for proving my point for me, David. People use the database all the time, some more than others, but it still gets used. It's just less useful to me now that I've cataloged roughly 98% of my collection. -Dave (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) OMG, don't even say that! I'm using it so much it's hard to imagine what it'll be like without it! (...) Yep. (...) - David (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
Heh! I agree with both of you guys! BTW Larry, who made you LUGNET's policeman? You just wish you had as much creativity and talent as Eric. :-P (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
I agree with everything said here Eric, (...) Truth be told, I only saw this recently, a few weeks ago, I meant to pass on my congrats through e-mail but forgot completely, sorry. :-( (...) Amen! when I was just getting started with showing off my (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Actually, Kevin, I do remember...and thanks! The scans were incredibly useful to me at one time, as I'm sure they are useful to others now. I do check them from time to time, as I haven't memorized them yet. :) They were most useful in (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Of course I do. It would be nice to see scans for certain UFO sets that weren't there last time I checked. Personally, I don't care about new instructions. I care about new inventories. Printing complete sets of new instructions is a no- no. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Presumably you're clear on WHY Brickshelf doesn't go right to the very newest set and support that position, right? Someone asked that the very newest Harry Potter set instructions for Hogwart's Castle be scanned. Rather thoughtless of that (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Do you remember what it was like before the scan archive? If it's really not all that useful anymore I could take it down and save a few Mbit/s :) Seriously, the instructions and set inventories have very little functional overlap. Those (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET's address (in Belmont, MA) will discontinue in a few weeks. -Suz (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Nah -- I'm a cold hearted mercenary, who'd do and say anything to pay the bills! :-, But I left Novell a little over a year ago. I didn't like the new direction they were going (hint: it involved laying off my wife, who was perpetually (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) (Mine is actually stable for at least another 10 months.) (...) paypal@lugnet.com (...) I would think of looking there too, now that you mention it. I'm not sure it really belongs there, however, because the sign-up process involves filling (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) <fun> What? Sproat! I thought you were a cold hearted Novell junkie like me - no open source anything! You want to know? Cough up some cash! not like Dan and all his "it's free, and i made a change and they implimented it" software :) </fun> (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Sometimes trying is a good approach. Try this one if you're so inclined: suz@baseplate.com which seems to be a valid addy for PayPal. (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Which reminds me to ask what the current PayPal address is, if you don't mind my asking (it's not on the "become a member" page which was where I thought to look)... (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET doesn't generate enough funds to support itself. Todd and I carry the hosting, etc. and none of us see any money for what we do. All time is volunteered. Donations are always welcome and very appreciated. Which reminds me: currently, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I have to agree, I've sent Dan a few updates for the information on LUGNET DB and the info was updated within hours (in most cases within minutes!). Great job! Congratulations! - David (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Well I've been dinged in the past for suggesting how to implement things, but I'll venture to offer that an enhancement request tracker doesn't have to be NEW code and doesn't have to be done HERE. Sourceforge has a pretty good one, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) I too would like to take the moment to exclaim me too. :-, Perhaps a "me too" checkbox would be in order too (just kidding :-) (...) This would be really keen and everything, but it really depends on two things: the capability of the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) That's what I've heard. :-, At any rate, best wishes to Steve, Jenn, and Dan -- it's quite the chore but it must be rewarding too. Cheers, - jsproat (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
