 | | Re: Newest Members
|
|
Well, I've kind of written off the membership package; I'm #423, and I've still not recieved the package, but it really doesn't bother me much, because I get so much out of LUGNET that I should really be busy upping my voluntary contribution level (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Logging in?
|
|
Thanks Suz. Works like a champ! Keep up the great work, guys. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug, or feature
|
|
(...) It's a bug. It's actually serving static pre-generated data, so that's why the icon never changes. Simplest thing, I'll just remove the icon so it's not wrong. Better solution would be to make the header dynamic and keep the rest of the page (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How much to licence Lugnet technology?
|
|
(...) It's conceivable. It was designed to work in a variety of situations. There is quite a bit of LUGNET-specific stuff, though. I never got it all as separated cleanly as I'd wanted to. (...) Well, it's not actually for sale or license...although (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) Thanks, Benjamin. I moved recently to a new place, which took a toll on me (physically and emotionally) and also don't yet have a reliable Internet connection at home, so my online time has been spotty lately. There have been some other life (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) Hi, I apologize for the lack of communication and delays in processing. Todd did in fact take a little time off and I'm filling in. In future, please feel free to mail me at suz@lugnet.com to get my direct attention. -Suz (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) I agree with Ben. I'm amazed that Todd is able to take care of this site. I would loose my mind trying to what he does. Each day this site grows bigger and bigger, and that takes more and more time. While I understand your frustration, you (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) that (...) Seconded. I also noticed that when I joined I went through a process of joining Pay Pal because they would pay five dollars towards the membership fee. When I update my member profile, I see that I still owe $5. Has anyone else (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
This may sound a little harsh, but I don't think some of you really understand what it takes to maintain a board in general, and a world-wide based board like this in particular.... I don't want to speak on behalf of Todd Lehman, but I am quite sure (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) I'm not sure, but the last update took well over a month. There is a break in time between member #1105 and #1106 (May 25 to July 4). And after #1106 there are MANY members that "joined" on July 4. I applied for a membership on June 6 and it (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Newest Members
|
|
How often does the newest members bit on the LUGNET home page get updated? Thanks Carl (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I haven't changed my opinion - didn't like it to start with and still don't - but I'll put up with it in order to be rid of the spoofer(s). I'm posting less because of it. (I read via newsreader and it adds (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
(...) I really liked the PGP option, but that never seemed to go anywhere. Allowing e-mail replies helped a lot - though it wouldn't be hard to cook something up with Procmail and Perl to get around it. Sooner or later, someone will probably do (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
(...) Roger that! It's been a few weeks now since it was introduced and we had a flurry of discussion. Are there folks who have changed their opinions significantly one way or the other? (I like it better than ever, but that's not a significant (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
agreed. i dont like faked id posts -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:GG9CJK.AFH@lugnet.com... (...) want (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
(...) I've used both the e-mail and the web URL to confirm my posts. In both cases it has worked flawlessly. I'm very glad to be rid of the MadHatter and his antics. This small inconvenience is well worth the benefits. John Hansen (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Logging in?
|
|
(...) If using the web interface for posting, this is true. (...) yes, we'll mail you. stay tuned. -Suz (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for a link
|
|
(...) No problem. Done. (URL) added a "suggest a link" there too, for ease in future. -Suz (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Logging in?
|
|
Hello, I hope this is the right place for this... Do I read correctly somewhere that if you login to Lugnet, your posts appear automatically again? i.e. You don't need to confirm them. If so, I would love to take advantage of this! Which leads to my (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Request for a link
|
|
Todd, Would it be possible to add a link on the RCX/NQC page to my webpage for RcxCC version 3.2 (my revision to Mark Overmars original RcxCC). I've had a few people email me asking where it can be found and invariably they had looked for a link (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
