 | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Its also sad April Fools Day is on the American calendar. What are those guys thinking? And under no circumstances is it acceptable to play an April Fools' joke a week ahead, never. (...) Dude, R-E-L-A-X. Mark IM'ed me with the url for the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) First off, when I posted nobody had said anything about the hoax. The first 'realization-message’ came about 3 min prior to my post. Therefore, I only realized that it was a fake after I had posted mine. Secondly, it’s not cool when several (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3ABEC5F9.A3D7E2...ing.com... (...) I think what peeves me most about this is it got to be featured on the main Lugnet web page. Even if it were not a joke, I don't think it warrants such (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) It isn't a joke. Perhaps I'm in a bad mood, but I really am getting sick of all these jokes, and I do have a real concern for the viability of electronic communication. I must stress however that I don't think we're that close to the brink of (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) This is another joke right? I hope so, cuz this is nothing to get this wound up about Gabe (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) These stupid jokes are starting to get on my nerves. I'd also say that this topic is entirely off topic for this group. It isn't fun (if it wasn't a joke, it's not fun, if it is a joke, it's sick, it's definitely LEGO related and therefor off (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) It could probably go in either, but since this is news-related, I'm more comfortable with it being in the .nntp group. If you're talking about the TLC filter, that's pretty much entirely and .nntp thing. (...) Ya, it's a quirk (and I find it (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Using a Lugnet member's page as a splash page for a Brickbay store.
|
|
(...) I don't have anything against using a Lugnet(TM) page as a splash page in your store. Only FYI, you can use your Brickbay "About Me" page as your splash page which you can edit right in myBrickbay and don't have to use any FTP program every (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Turnaround Time on CLSOTW Ad Banner Submissions?
|
|
(...) Wonderful. Thank you for the rapid response. (25 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Turnaround Time on CLSOTW Ad Banner Submissions?
|
|
(...) Sorta; it says within a day or so after having been received and processed. It's been received but not processed. I'll go process it now. Sorry about the confusion...it's not clear on that page what it means...it's meant to be fuzzy. Check (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
