 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
Whoops, typo: Fix this: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm pretty sure it is, but clarity is essential. to read: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) And why shouldn't I have the right to point out irrational anti MS bias? Especially when it's posted in a non useful way, as I said. Todd does have a special responsibility to keep the line between his private persona and his public one (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7JFp5.9sE@lugnet.com... (...) A bit confused with this statement... (...) No, it wouldn't. Member benefits would still be the same, just when you signed up to post, you would get a member (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) Yeah, there's similar-names problems too, like Mark Nelson and Marc Nelson, Jr. (which confused me at first until I met one of them in person). -Shiri. (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird thing I just noticed
|
|
(...) The newsgroup doesn't exist, but quick check shows that the articles *are* still accessible - from here: (URL) www.- prefix instead of news.- prefix.) So Todd simply never moved the articles to news.lugnet.com . Interesting. That makes me (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) When I say "a large percentage" above, I mean that roughly, say, 80% are crystal clear match-ups. That leaves, say, 20% which aren't, and should be checked by hand. As there are 5200 registered 'From:' lines and 850 members, we're talking (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) To me, too - cool idea. And I can definitely see usefulness, finding your own posts, finding people's pages without multiple searches, etc. (...) Yeah... After all, how many discrepancies do you forsee/approximate within less than 1000 people? (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird thing I just noticed
|
|
(...) This has been a problem ever since the first search function back in 1998, and I'm sorry for all the confusion it has caused when articles labeled "Canceled" show up in search results. In a feverish moment of clarity the other night, I thought (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) Sounds good. (...) Good idea there, but - (...) If only a few need to be matched by hand, then why not take that approach and the rest by hand may not need to be matched? Are you going to take the approach we discussed - assigning EVEYRONE a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) It would be a preprequisite, yes, since the association table which would map 'From:' lines to member id's (and vice-versa) would make the rest much simpler. Once that's done (and I haven't begun to attack the problem yet but am becoming (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
