 | | Re: Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) I think it could be cookie based (he said, while simulteneously knowing nothing about cookies). After all, posting identity is cookie based, is it not? Do we really need to worry about "rogue cancellers" cancelling all kinds of Lugnet posts (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) Awesome! :) When did this start working? I swear, it didn't use to do this... And exclusion works, too. Put "-cypress" to ignore all those expensive parts. This is Most Cool. Too bad this doesn't actually answer Dave!'s question. Searching for (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) Agree. Taking away cancel from NNTP would probably be a step backwards-- I don't want to stoop to the lowest common denominator... But it'd be nice to be able to cancel things via the web interface, or at least things posted via the web (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Web interface cancels (was Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is)
|
|
(...) For what it's worth, I agree with both of you(!!) inasmuch as getting cancel rights to the web interface, although if it's not possible for one reason or other I wouldn't want to see it taken away from NNTP. eric (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is
|
|
(...) I agree with Larry(!). If nothing else, I'd like to see equality between web and nttp posters - even if we have to take away the nttp right to cancel. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let's define what an auction announcement/update is
|
|
(...) Please reconsider providing a mechanism for cancelling web originated posts that is more automated than "send Todd a note in email and hope he sees it". ++Lar (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: STUPID QUESTION?
|
|
(...) The only amendment I'll make is that having a quoted string be a search word (not regarded as two) would be helpful-- If I'm looking for posts about THE classic castle, the search string: +classic +castle may very well show me a lot more of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
|
(...) If Todd were to think that I am being deliberately disruptive in this group, I'm sure he would just stop me from posting in it. If I were being deliberately disruptive in this group, I'd expect to be stopped. But the fact is, I'm not (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
(...) Cool. Thanks for the fast fix. James (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Query regarding the <set:foo> function
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
