Subject:
|
Re: Selecting top stories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:23:56 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
160 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote:
>
> But I'm not sure that counting followups can replace ratings, because
> someone posting a response to a message doesn't indicate that they feel the
> message is important or newsworthy. Sometimes, they feel just the opposite
> way.
Then why did they bother to reply?
> Instead of changing the system, I'd rather encourage members to rate
> messages they feel are rate-worthy.
I'd do it, except that I read LUGnet with a newsreader. I started hacking
rating support into slrn, but then I got distracted.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Selecting top stories
|
| (...) They might very much dislike the earlier post, and they'd give it a very low rating. Maybe they discovered a typo that they couldn't resist pouncing on. Maybe they like to type a lot. Steve (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Selecting top stories
|
| (...) I've noticed that most messages get very few ratings. But I'm not sure that counting followups can replace ratings, because someone posting a response to a message doesn't indicate that they feel the message is important or newsworthy. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
