 | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) Clearly. <grin> Surely the cosmic waves were attracted to Larry's magnetic personality. -Shiri XFUT .o-t.fun (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) not. (...) Well, I never make misteaks so... Cosmic rays clearly dropped a missing "some" in my referenced post, the sentence should read: "This info is available about *some* members." Thanks! ++Lar (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Apology
|
| I apologise Todd, I mistyped your name on a previous posting. As I am unable to cancel a message through the web interface- I am apologising though this message. Sorry. Alex (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Memberships- Where to send them?
|
| To : Tood Lehman. I want to become a member of Lugnet! However with memberships I prefer to work with snail mail for application and confimration, rather than electronic ( especially whne payments are concerned.) Are you able to provide an adress to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) Agreed. (...) Uh, not really, some members prefer to keep that confidential. Especially younger ones; my mom specifically asked me to leave out my age (on my webpage too), even though I thought it was silly because everyone here knows all (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Thanks to those who mailed me. (...) *Sigh* (...) Substantiate this please, if you can. I see this time and time again here. Words are words. They not not suddenly change their meaning when one employs seeks legal advise... they are just the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> <snip> (...) 41. Not to be too picky, but I believe that Age is displayed only if the member wishes it to be. -Andy Lynch (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) I am not sure I agree. I think standards of behaviour have to be enforced, and that while we may make certain allowances, one's age, mental health, mood, or political beliefs (to name a few factors that might be cited by someone trying to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Let's be clear here, are you asking for someone to mail you a description of the contents (which you've already seen if you've read the thread, but briefly, it's proprietary marketing and pricing information that is the property of TLC), or (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) sway (...) censor's (...) <SNIPPED> So if it is not "censorship", what is it? I missed the posts (e-mails welcome), so I have no real ideal what was in the post. So to me this denial of information, for no solid reason as far as I can see, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Agreed. And thanks for digging up the cyberlaw cite, those were the very cases I was referring to, although I was incorrect in referring to Compuserve as a common carrier, their defense was the library defense. (Believe it or not, I think (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) This is a very interesting read, IMHO: (URL) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) True, that is usually the case. However, according to M-W, to censor is to "[...] suppress or delete anything considered objectionable". "Suppress" certainly has connotations of "before publication", but "delete" doesn't. Anyway. It's not (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) It depends, could a "reasonable" person find them, if they had "reasonable" knowlage of how it worked? (in other words, if Jorge left his price scanner and I picked it up, and tried looking at _all_ the 71xx series lego, would I have found (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) James, Above, as Mike Timm just pointed out, you quoted something which has absolutely nothing to do with the Terms and Conditions here or the Terms of Use Agreement. What you quoted was from a plan document -- a manifesto -- a public (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| Brazenly oversnipping for humorous effect... (...) I Dispute that the T&C say this! In fact I'm pretty sure they say: "All other themes are just scenery or spare parts for Trains!". YCLIU. ++Lar (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I will counter with the info from this post that I made that applies to me, Jorge or anyone else who has "accepted the conditions for posting" here at Lugnet.. see (URL) post referenced is about some Castle set info I had, not anything else (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Ooog ooog ooog :) Actually, I believe that Canadian case law is similar to the US on this point. You either exert no control, or you're responsible. <snip> (...) That's _belabour_. Ooog ooog ooog :) Jeff Elliott (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) You'll have to ask TLC -- post to lugnet.lego.direct and see if/how they answer that. Or write via e-mail directly to Brad. I can only speculate that, while they may be annoyed, they may not have any legal grounds for getting upset in the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Err, oops. That sentence makes no sense. I meant is, if I did that, TLC wouldn't care? If not, why not? The same info from the list could then just end up repackaged and still getting out there. eric (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
