| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > I missed the posts (e-mails welcome),
Thanks to those who mailed me.
>
> Let's be clear here, are you asking for someone to mail you a description of
> the contents (which you've already seen if you've read the thread, but
> briefly, it's proprietary marketing and pricing information that is the
> property of TLC), or were you asking for someone to mail you the posts
> themselves? I suspect the latter but certainly welcome correction.
>
> If so, what other stolen goods were you planning on soliciting for on Lugnet?
>
> Seriously, I'm not sure it's a good idea to make Lugnet a party to your
> conspiring to receive, as Lugnet can't assert the library or common carrier
> defense, IMHO.
*Sigh*
>
> > so I have no real ideal what was in the post. So to me this denial of
> > information, for no solid reason as far as I can see, feels like censorship.
>
> It might feel like censorship, and in the broad meaning the public uses, you
> might think it is, but in the narrow, legalistic and definitionally correct
> view, it's not.
Substantiate this please, if you can. I see this time and time again here.
Words are words. They not not suddenly change their meaning when one employs
seeks legal advise... they are just the same old words I'm afraid.
> Censorship is a priori. This was a postiori, among other
> important differences.
I'm not sure what you mean(?)
> My take on this is that editorial control is a very
> broad meaning
Is that the normal, legal, bar, or your own meaning? :-)
I think you are right, but think the phrase is used because it _is_ vauge.
> and we're stuck with it for good or ill, while censorship is a
> very narrow one and we don't have it here, thank goodness.
Well, what do we have (concisely please)?
Scott A
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Let's be clear here, are you asking for someone to mail you a description of the contents (which you've already seen if you've read the thread, but briefly, it's proprietary marketing and pricing information that is the property of TLC), or (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
