Subject:
|
Re: My last word on the profanity debate.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 20:17:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
677 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Beaker wrote in message ...
> Chris, if I misunderstood your point and over-reacted I apologize. I've
> let this get somewhat personal, and that's my failing.
That's ok, it was more that you seemed to be reacting to what I didn't say.
But yeah, I think we're not really gaining ground at this point, and
Todd has pretty much said his say, we might as well stop.
I suppose what I hope for now is that no-one feels the need to test
the boundaries.
Moz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | My last word on the profanity debate.
|
| OK, I'm really tired of this debate. I think the participants have reached impasse, and unlike most USENET debates I get into, it isn't fun. So: Chris, if I misunderstood your point and over-reacted I apologize. I've let this get somewhat personal, (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![My last word on the profanity debate. -Jim Baker (2-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: My last word on the profanity debate. -Mike Stanley (2-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: My last word on the profanity debate. -Todd Lehman (2-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|