Subject:
|
My last word on the profanity debate.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 06:40:58 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
beaker@NOMORESPAMpobox.com
|
Viewed:
|
659 times
|
| |
|
|
OK, I'm really tired of this debate. I think the participants have
reached impasse, and unlike most USENET debates I get into, it isn't
fun. So:
Chris, if I misunderstood your point and over-reacted I apologize. I've
let this get somewhat personal, and that's my failing.
Todd, I await your decision. As I said, I will honor it regardless of
how I feel about it. If I'm truly in the minority on this point, if
something like 95% of users support such a ban, I'll even agree with it,
philosophically at least, even if I disapprove in principal.
To the rest of you, if I've drug this out I apologize to you as well. I
hope you can understand that my position is a philosophical one. I'm
not encouraging the worst possible behavior, merely objecting to a
blanket ban on a disputed issue.
/ _ _ / _ _ The high cost of living has not diminished its popularity
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: My last word on the profanity debate.
|
| (...) Jim, I don't know that it's really possible to make a meaningful decision. (I hope it is, but I'm not convinced.) Certainly, on the liberal side of the coin, we could say that anything goes -- as on Usenet -- but that would make it much more (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: My last word on the profanity debate.
|
| Beaker wrote in message ... (...) That's ok, it was more that you seemed to be reacting to what I didn't say. But yeah, I think we're not really gaining ground at this point, and Todd has pretty much said his say, we might as well stop. I suppose (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
