 | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) LUGNET is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The LEGO Company. --Todd (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Todd, with respect, I do not think you have answered my question? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, he has. Steve (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Todd, with respect, I do not think you have answered my question? How are you defining "sponsored" & "endorsed"? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) That is really a question for Brad. (...) True encouragement comes only from within. (...) Brad Justus made "on behalf of The LEGO Company" a financial donation to LUGNET. Since I am not psychic, I cannot know whether it is the first or the (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | This thread is a total waste of time, but I like a good nitpick as much as the next guy so I need to do a tangential 'pick... (...) Hrm... unless Brad made the donation from his personal funds, this last sentence is probably not accurate. Since (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That's quite accurate. (...) That part is a bit fuzzy in my mind. The bank draft (check) was not of the regular LEGO type (for instance what they pay employees or freelancers with) but was cut from an "operating account" and printed on a what (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Sounds like a check from Lego Direct to me. I've never heard of such a thing as a pseudo-personal spending account. KL (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I saved a photocopy it's clearly not from Lego Direct. It's from a "LEGO Systems, Inc. Operating Account," whatever an "Operating Account" is. To me it sounds like some kind of special expenses account, but that's speculation. --Todd (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | | (...) An "Operating Account" is the primary checking account that businesses use to deposit receivables and pay vendors. It is also used to pay employee expenses when an expense report is filed. Operating Account funds are also periodically (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I meant that the check per se wasn't from LEGO Direct. The donation (the money) was apparently from LEGO Direct, since it's how Brad signed the accompanying letter, but the check itself wasn't from LEGO Direct. Hope that clears up the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Inferring form is actions, I, personally, _assume_ he does. (...) LP summed up, more or less, my thoughts on this. (...) Here lies my problem. I could pick up my dictionary, and come away with a different meanings. If you want to be clear, and (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't think that Lego would appreciate such a change. It wasn't their intention. (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) ... and, if true, why do you think that would be? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | (...) Perhaps because official sponsership or endorsement would cause more headaches than the occasional no-strings-attached gift. LEGO as a company do it all the time - they might send out a K8 to a LEGOfest, organise local events; they have a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes: <snipped well said reply/explanation> (...) A capital idea, would that it only would take hold. I for one am baffled why this thread has went on so long on such a tiny point that seems so stunningly (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I think I said -- and I think it's obvious. They don't want any of the legal responsibilities that would come with an endorsement/sponsorship relationship. (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) With respect? What exactly about this inane nitpicking is "respectful"? Define annoying. Define clueless. Define ... beating a dead horse. (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I admire your debating skills :-) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
