To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6818
6817  |  6819
Subject: 
Re: 1 new or 3?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 06:24:12 GMT
Viewed: 
429 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
I hope that despite all of the discussion, Todd keeps this one low priority.
:)

Agreed.

However, sometimes the one line fix (that truly *IS* a 1 line fix, that is,
about 11 % of them :-) ) that can be banged out in 15 minutes, especially if
the likelihood of failure is low, and the consequences of failure are minimal,
is a GREAT way to take a break from a big huge thorny high priority major
rewrite. Even if it is low priority to get it fixed.

No idea if this is a one line fix or not, of course, without seeing the code.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 1 new or 3?
 
I hope that despite all of the discussion, Todd keeps this one low priority. :) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

10 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR