Subject:
|
Re: lugnettiquete question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Nov 1998 00:09:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
764 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:40:13 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve
Bliss) wrote:
> With that in mind, is it appropriate to <snip> quotes more aggresively
> on lugnet? I'd rather have shorter quotes than longer, but I don't
> want to over-<snip> to the point that readers have no idea what I'm
> talking about.
No! Quote still. Just because I read the previous post does NOT mean I
have access to it when I read yours. I download messages to my
computer, and read and reply offline.. Then close. When I close Agent,
it PURGES all the old messages there. Then, next time I connect, it
posts my messages and receives new ones. If you reply to something
without quoting, I have no clue what your post means. Most of the
time, I'll just ignore it. If it gets too frequent, I might complain
loudly on the newsgroup. In either case, though, you are not getting
your message across.
Sarah Heacock
sarah@eskimo.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | lugnettiquete question
|
| Short question: since lugnet newsgroups are served up from a single source, there are no issues with propagation errors. There is no problem of "my server never got the original message". If I reply to any message, anyone reading my follow-up also (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
