Subject:
|
lugnettiquete question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:40:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
807 times
|
| |
|
|
Short question: since lugnet newsgroups are served up from a single
source, there are no issues with propagation errors. There is no
problem of "my server never got the original message". If I reply to
any message, anyone reading my follow-up also has access to the
original message.
With that in mind, is it appropriate to <snip> quotes more aggresively
on lugnet? I'd rather have shorter quotes than longer, but I don't
want to over-<snip> to the point that readers have no idea what I'm
talking about.
Trivial example: if I wanted to make a MeToo! post, would I / should I
skip the quote entirely, and just put
Me Too!
in the body of the message?
Steve
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: lugnettiquete question
|
| Steve Bliss writes: <snipped with that in mind> (...) I think the italicized line from the posting page says it all: "Please be courteous to your readers..." I know it's only an example, so I'll run with it: "Me Too" is not considered courteous for (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnettiquete question
|
| (...) I usually like to snip as much as possible, as opposed to as little as necessary. I'd say: 1. Always always always snip sigs and garbage added by third-party free e-mail sites. ("Get your free @foofoo.com e-mail here!") 2. Except in truly rare (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnettiquete question
|
| (...) No! Quote still. Just because I read the previous post does NOT mean I have access to it when I read yours. I download messages to my computer, and read and reply offline.. Then close. When I close Agent, it PURGES all the old messages there. (...) (26 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
