 | | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) I agree that people shouldn't partake in name-calling etc, but to be fair - in the context of the (heated) debate, the name-calling was not just one-way. Which I was why I was more offended by the latter post - my opinion :) (...) Agreed too - (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
"Richard Franks" <spontificus@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Fs4z4t.D76@lugnet.com... (...) has (...) then I (...) fair - in (...) This happens quite a lot (too much?) on LUGNET. Once positions have been adopted in debates, the same points get (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fs528t.6yz@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) to (...) Nope, this is an Internet-wide problem. In fact the LUGNET situation is not even close to the 'holy wars' being fought in comp.sys.amiga.misc and (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Well, in a lot of ways there could never be a consensus on this issue. You're looking at two sides that are completely unlike each other. One side is content to let market forces continue to work while the other seems to want to ignore those (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Thanks, Richard. I have stated elsewhere that I took pains to NOT particularize the discussion and to avoid the specific mention of anyone by name. Everyone else insisted upon it. They get what they deserve -- my opposition! -- Richard (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
