 | | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) I have received 3 lugnet.trains mail echo posts since you turned it on for me. Since the instructions were rather vague, I presume it's currently a human (you :-) ) processing the requests... Seems to be working fine. Can you turn off "trains" (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) I want to live on the same Lugnet street as Larry so I can go over and play with his trains all the time. :) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) Yes, currently by hand...one step at a time. :) I have some things in mind for auto-administration of subscription lists because I won't want to do it by hand forever. It won't be very fancy but it'll get the job done. --Todd (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
My understanding is that you are offering the ability to receive messages sent to any lugnet.* group via email. Does it follow that if on any given day there are 32 messages posted to the lugnet.general group, all the group's email subscribers would (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) Actually, Todd, this might be a way to deal with gatewaying lists. It's not nearly so transparent, but it kinda sidesteps some of the problematic issues. Have a lugnet.list.crynwr-robotics, and autopost daily a digest of messages from that (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) That's correct. In fact, it's running now, and I'm posting this message via e-mail. The 'X-Nntp-Gateway' header of this message should say X-Nntp-Gateway: lugnet.admin.general@lugnet.com (...) Yes, that's 100% possible. And probably pretty (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.* discussion groups by mail
|
|
(...) I was thinking that there probably wouldn't/shouldn't be a way to reply to a digest message. If someone wanted to reply to a message they'd have to create a new message and directed to the appropriate address and cut/paste relevent info from (...) (26 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
