 | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —James Brown
|
| | | (...) Yah. A smaller font would go a long way towards making it less jarring, but I suspect that the best (as in 'least jarring') solution would be to have the main page (and derivatives thereof) actually showing the number of messages it claims to. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Sorry 'bout that. That was a total accident -- never was supposed to be that big. I forgot the SIZE="-2" attribute in the <FONT> tag and didn't test properly. (...) Wouldda loved to've been able to do that quickly, but that'd require some (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) immediate). Actually, I was surprised by how much of a difference the font size made. Rather than ripping up the guts and rearranging them to allow article hiding (unless you see a need for it?) - You mentioned the possibility of a cookie in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Has it? I think one large thread here probably belonged there.. meanwhile the work of the council to get itself organized seems stuck. Frank keeps posting great summations and ideas and we're not running with the ball. (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm. Well, in the great usenet tradition of "if you agree with it, don't post", we probably have consensus that Frank's ideas are good (but I'll have to go hunt and confirm, for myself). My questions (mostly for Todd) are: Have you got the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Here's a kludgy suggestion which can reduce, but not eliminate, the jarring "missing" messages. I surmise you are fetching the most recent 4 messages and then supresssing when required. Fetch more. Stack the fails and take the first 4 that pass. If (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
