Subject:
|
Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:24:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
882 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, James Brown writes:
> > Yah. A smaller font would go a long way towards making it less jarring,
>
> Sorry 'bout that. That was a total accident -- never was supposed to be that
> big. I forgot the SIZE="-2" attribute in the <FONT> tag and didn't test
> properly.
>
>
> > but I suspect that the best (as in 'least jarring') solution would be to
> > have the main page (and derivatives thereof) actually showing the number of
> > messages it claims to. I'm not sure how hard that would be, implementation-
> > wise, though.
>
> Wouldda loved to've been able to do that quickly, but that'd require some
> major voodoo rewriting (which'll prolly happen eventually but isn't
immediate).
Actually, I was surprised by how much of a difference the font size made.
Rather than ripping up the guts and rearranging them to allow article hiding
(unless you see a need for it?) - You mentioned the possibility of a cookie in
another thread - that seems a quicker & better stopgap until you can implement
RSS. (assuming, of course, that you are - but that's the impression I've
gotten from recent discussion here)
Aside - admin.council has accomplished 1 thing at least - admin.general is
back to threads about structure and design and general queries. :)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> Alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
| (...) Has it? I think one large thread here probably belonged there.. meanwhile the work of the council to get itself organized seems stuck. Frank keeps posting great summations and ideas and we're not running with the ball. (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
| (...) Sorry 'bout that. That was a total accident -- never was supposed to be that big. I forgot the SIZE="-2" attribute in the <FONT> tag and didn't test properly. (...) Wouldda loved to've been able to do that quickly, but that'd require some (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
111 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
