 | | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
(...) Yes, someone could do that. --Todd (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
Well toss one of my 2 votes today as they were trying to see if I could do it... :-) What about the "lack of comments" part of the question? Did you get many comments when voting was by mail? (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
(...) How do transactions coming through a firewall show up? Don't they tend to show up as a single IP address (or at least a very small set) for a whole group of people? (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
(...) Oh, didn't realize there was a question. (I thought you were only making a statement about comments.) No, never got comments as part of the votes, because the mechanism for sending the form by e-mail was to use <FORM METHOD=POST (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
(...) Possibly. Haven't tried to isolate that. Better solution would be an altogether completely different one which took votes only from registered lifetime members and let people optionally spread their vote across more than one site if they (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
|
Well I don't know if this helps a bit but this is the hidden source from one of my page's forms: <input TYPE=IMAGE SRC="../../submit.jpg" NAME="E-Mail" ALT="Submit the form!"> <input type=hidden name="recipient" value="fusion@refraxion.com"> <input (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
