 | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) It's an or-best-offer sale. On the internet, sure, there's little difference, but it is a valid sale type. (...) Umm, because it's in no way a sealed bid auction? EBay sends you updates telling you when someone outbids you, shows you a history (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) that (...) itself (...) difference, (...) auction (...) the (...) Well, if you bid, you generally get zero (if your offer wasn't good enough) or one update notice. Either an outbid notice or a "you won" notice. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) I personally think that SBA's are enough of an auction that they shouldn't be in .BST. However, I've sort-of come around to agreeing with Todd on allowing them there, for a couple of reasons. First being that there really isn't a sufficient (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Ok ok ok wait wait stop. I *don't* think that SBA's should be allowed in .buy-sell-trade. What I've always been trying to say is that an SBA is mathematically equivalent to a plain old regular OBO sale. In other words, SBA's that are conducted (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Frank Filz
|
| | | | James Brown wrote in message ... (...) be (...) allowing (...) and (...) mostly (...) the (...) in (...) provide (...) I happen to agree. In fact, if OBO's become relegated to lugnet.market.auction, then the only things which would be acceptable (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
