 | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | All in favor? I think Frank just got himself a chair. (1) Rereading my post 2 refs back it looks like I was saying I'd be chair if asked. What I actually meant was I'd be a committee member if asked. 1 - Seriously... step one in organizing a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I've been watching this discussion over the past few days. Mainly because my name popped up in a proportion of the posts - the reasons for which are clear. It is apparent to me that if .council is to work (ie discuss, deliberate, arbitrate, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Good point. If you infer that I was invited you would be correct... It's not my place to reveal who else Todd invited, it's Todd's, so you'll have to take my word for this, but I do know who he invited, at least in the first round, and I would (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) that (...) base (...) to (...) I did not mean to infer, but I did assume it to be the case. (...) You include yourself in this? :-) I must admit, I find this whole development rather interesting. I anticipate that, if LUGNet continues to grow, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Self Organization (was Re: Self Organisation —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Well I *did* say "most". :-) But yes, I consider myself highly regarded by at least one member of the community. Me. FUT off-topic.fun (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in article <38B07471.4ED1A93E@v...er.net>... (...) Ummmmm...... isn't 'appointing' a council somewhat contrary to the way that Todd has always run LUGNET? (at least so far as I've seen in the last year+) It (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) No, it's not intended to be a private council, unless someone takes something off-line personally on their own accord unofficially. Anyone is still also welcome to participate in the discussions (offering opinions, raising concerns, making (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Whoops, that probably sounds contradictory. What I mean is that stuff should IMHO be discussed openly in the .admin.council group -- there shouldn't be any hush-hush secret stuff going on in the background. If something's being discussed (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in article <FqB237.Aqu@lugnet.com>... (...) that (...) way (...) something (...) also (...) Ooops, I guess I should have been a bit more clear in my questioning. I meant that it seems as though the selection (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) On a hunch: It's because, especially in a small community (which Lugnet still is), democracy doesn't necessarily bring the best people to the table. I've worked with a number of small special interest groups(1), and it's very easy for an (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | James Brown <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in article <FqB4M3.KH4@lugnet.com>... (...) suggesting (...) be (...) become (...) to (...) still (...) I've (...) easy (...) blatantly, (...) job, (...) Well, using that logic, if the best person (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, they can. But why? More on this below... (...) Hmm. I think you missed the gist of my point. People who want to do it are not necessarily the same people that Todd & Suzanne want doing, or are comfortable working with. (...) I'm not (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | | | James Brown <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in article <FqB9J7.Hos@lugnet.com>... (...) in (...) want (...) which (...) their (...) nomination (...) the (...) are (...) I caught your point entirely. I've cut our conversation from above and (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think that may have been a misunderstanding though - the thread was trying to nominate someone who would recieve ideas on what the council should do, how it should work, how it should be planned. But I agree - things are moving fast - the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ok. Looks like it was me who misunderstood. :) I guess I'm just coming at this from a perspective of "why vote if we don't have to?" The .council group is an open forum, so everyone is still able to bring an opinion forward; IMHO, Todd's just (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Think of it as an external 'nother brain (this time a collective one) making recommendations taken very seriously rather than purely acting on behalf of. Think of it as what happens in a corporation or organization when someone is hired to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) delicate (...) large (...) forth (...) citizen (...) I think Allan was suggesting voting on who the council members were. This might be reasonable, but perhaps is best handled the way many organizations handle (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
