Subject:
|
Re: Todd, I'm very much confused!..:-( (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 10:32:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
182 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Selçuk Göre writes:
> Todd, Here are the snippets from a reply message posted by you, which
> clearly describes that posting a message containing URL's to a site full of
> with leaked Lego info is OK with T&C, although a not a desired behavior (or
> this is what I understand from the below, sorry if I misinterpreted it).
Almost... What I said was, "Yes, I believe that would be technically OK
with T&C. However,..." (Note the slight fuzziness.)
> Just another weekend that I don't checked lugnet and just as the last week,
> I saw all the turbulence caused by second leak(????) with a big surprise.
> I've already browsed through it so I know that you apologized for it, so
> it's not my intention to stretch it. All I want is to clearing up a
> confusion.
>
> They are from TLC's very own site and Netscape or IE is not a hacking tool
> at all (they enabled us to manually enter URLs, right?) and so on, BUT, what
> if they are not from www.lego.com?
I don't think it breaks the T&C. It may still irk or unsettle TLC, but who
knows, and, as Larry so deftly pointed out, a company ought to be prepared
for such things. Notwithstanding, it still probably may make the most sense
to play cards cautiously.
Anyway, I believe Brad Justus will try to answer these sorts of questions
officially over the coming week, after he returns from Billund:
http://www.lugnet.com/dear-lego/?n=694
> PS. Please don't answer me something in way that "what a shame, isn't it so
> obvious?..". I'm not ranting, I just really want to know. If it was obvious
> for me, I would not post this.
I agree that it's not obvious at all. Very gray area.
I look forward to hopefully someday having this all well-defined in legal
statements from LEGO, and most hopefully with examples and counter-examples.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Todd, I'm very much confused!..:-( (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?) -Selçuk Göre (13-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Todd, I'm very much confused!..:-( (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?) -Todd Lehman (13-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Todd, I'm very much confused!..:-( (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?) -Selçuk Göre (13-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Todd, I'm very much confused!..:-( (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?) -Matthew Miller (13-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|