 | | Wrong group posting ruckus —Frank Filz
|
| | | Looking at what is happening with wrong group postings I have some thoughts. It seems to me that we need to sit back and let Todd handle the wrong group postings until he specifically asks for help. When that occurs, I think it would be wise to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | I think you have a point. What's going on now is just annoying everyone. But having Todd look in his general mail ain't gonna work either. Perhaps a special mailbox just for admin type messages? I still like my suggestion of canned responses, which (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I like that too. At times I have considered making something where I could just click a button and -- zip! -- off would go a canned email to someone. --Todd (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —John Matthews
|
| | | | | | Just curious, what is the shelf life of canned email? :) Sounds like a good idea to me. John Matthews Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FKyLKs.DvK@lugnet.com... (...) could (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) LOL! Thanks for the laugh... :) --Todd (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Quick! Stock up on your ACME Canned E-Mail(R) for Y2K! You know the internet will crash and our ACME Canned E-Mail(R) is the only way you will survive. Chose from a wide variety of e-mail themes: Credit card spam Porn site spam Tasteless jokes (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | Well! (...) There IS an acme.com but they don't seem to have canned email. They DO have the phases of the moon, though. (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I suppose in some sense I should have made sure I picked a host name which didn't exist (of course there is no guarantee that at some time in the future such a host would exist, and I don't yet have my own domain to use...). On the other hand, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Christian Holtje
|
| | | | | | * John Matthews (jmatthew@columbus.rr.com) [991109 23:00]: (...) Well...it depends. If it has dents then you shouldn't buy it. It might have botched-email-ism. Or course, if it is irradiated email, it will last forever as all glitches have been (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Great quote! (was Re: Wrong group posting ruckus) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) Star Trek can turn your brains to puree of bat guano; and the greatest science fiction series of all time is Doctor Who! And I'll take you all on, one-by- one or all in a bunch to back it up! (...) That is a great quote! James (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Still collecting more data/thoughts... Here are a couple excellent examples of posts which just happened today, BTW, which illustrate the difficulty in drawing lines where non-auctions are concerned: 1. (URL) This isn't even remotely a "I've (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Wrong group posting ruckus —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Of course it could be a WTB, or, "Is the price I'm about to pay elsewhere reasonable?" We also don't have a clearcut market group for this type of post, and one certainly can argue that there is no point asking outside the theme since the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
