To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 3190
3189  |  3191
Subject: 
Re: Blind to icons
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 05:00:05 GMT
Viewed: 
354 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
but I've been a bit hesitant to make widespread use of them without better
understanding customized color settings in web browsers.  I seem to recall
someone (I think it was Tom Stangl) once long ago fervently denouncing the
use of white text on web pages.

--Todd

White text in graphics is ok, but white fonts are unprintable, and
that irritates some people alot.

KL



Message has 1 Reply:
  White text on webpages considered harmful or safe? (was: Re: Blind to icons)
 
(...) Is white text always unprintable? Whenever I print a page with text in a table with its BGCOLOR set, it comes out great. Workie: <TABLE ... BGCOLOR="#000000"><TR><TD> <FONT COLOR="#FFFFFF">foo foo foo</FONT> </TD></TR></TABLE> No workie: (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Blind to icons
 
(...) Great!--glad you like it. BTW, here is a larger version of it, from an unfinished layout experiment last December (1998)... (URL) you think it's too big? On that page, it's 197x197 pixels and 15530 bytes. For comparison, the current CLSotW (...) (25 years ago, 17-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

16 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR