| |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Matthew Miller writes:
> Scott Smallbeck <scotts@contactics.com> wrote:
> > Not this again. I got the same response in my last posting here:
> > http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/fun/?n=3175
> > There needs to be an on-topic.fun group!
>
> Hopefully, all of LUGnet is about fun in some way or another! I think "fun"
> lego posts are entirely appropriate in lugnet.general. "(set collection,
> educational usage, observations, original stories, games, holiday fun,
> rumors, musings, weird dreams, etc.)"
Definitely. Yup, this subject (the lego.com survey) is 100% on-topic to
.general, falling into the "observations" and "etc." portions of "community-
wide discussion of experiences and ideas (..., etc.)" and also under LEGO
"business units" (if you think of lego.com as a business unit of TLG).
The .off-topic hieararchy of groups is actually for "Off-topic (non-LEGO®)
discussions."
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Current LEGO.COM survey
|
| (...) Hopefully, all of LUGnet is about fun in some way or another! I think "fun" lego posts are entirely appropriate in lugnet.general. "(set collection, educational usage, observations, original stories, games, holiday fun, rumors, musings, weird (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
