Subject:
|
Re: RESULTS- CFV Johnathan Wilson's Posting Priviledges on LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 22:29:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.ANTISPAMcom
|
Viewed:
|
441 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> writes:
> > Adam Howard wrote:
> > > CFV Results
> > > Name 1a 1b 1c 2 3 3a 3b 3c 3d Com 2a
> > > 18 Jeremey Sproat N Y N Y Y Y - - - Y -
> > Um, thanks for publishing everyone's vote here. :-(
> Reminder: Adam stated in the CFV that everyone's vote would be published
> here -- <http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=2514>
> "After much discussion it has been decided that an open public vote
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> needs to be made about this situation.
Yah, I read this part (but see below), figuring it meant input but not
output; i.e. the "public" on LUGNET could vote, and do so openly -- i.e.
honestly.
> Along with the final result a list of people who voted and their
> ^^^^^^^^^
> response will be posted to lugnet.admin.general one week after voting has
> ^^^^^^^^
> started.
This part I missed. Arg. I had assumed (and we all know what they say
about assumption) that the results would include numbers, not details.
Definitely my bad.
> > Making these votes public was probably not the best thing to do...
> Why not?
Because of the potential for mob-mentality flamage. Keeping in mind that
we've seen a *lot* of incredibly immature responses to jw, I was not too
keen on being known as someone who would vote for leniency in his case.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
