 | | CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Adam Howard
|
| | | Revisions have been made to the vote questions. Problem Summary and Defense have not changed. CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 This is a Call For Votes (CFV) After much discussion it has been decided that an open public (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.announce)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | In article <FGuLrJ.7Ez@lugnet.com>, Adam Howard <abhoward10@hotmail.com> writes (...) Wow! Jonathan has really got up a lot of people's noses. I've not been directly affected by his posting habits, so I won't be voting. However, this may be an (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | Tony Priestman <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Xy5anEAMzAw3EwE...n.co.uk... (...) _PLEASE_ NOTE: All the lugnet.cad* groups invite novices who want help honing their skills. Those of us who author parts _love_ to guide newbies in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | | In article <FGxBz2.D9F@lugnet.com>, John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@ema il.msn.com> writes (...) No problem :-) I'm not currently interested in the CAD groups, and this vote came as a bit of a shock. Bearing in mind the good nature of the people (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Some of us think there is, and some of us, (including many stalwarts) feel they've been trying for many many months and have exhausted all the other alternatives. I dunno who is right, which is one reason why I suspect a vote was taken. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Adam Howard
|
| | | | | | Hi Larry, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37C163C4.CEB8ED...ger.net... (...) (snip) (...) Less than 20 people have voted so far. However, the LUGNET community is still evolving and there are no set rules like this for LUGNET (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | Wow. What's the point of using a totalitarian despot's private server if we have to pretend it is a democracy? -gyug (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | (...) I was inclined to think along these same lines early on, since it is mostly Todd's time (and money!) invested into LUGNET. However, the democracy model seems to work better with Todd's vision of what LUGNET should be -- a friendly, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET, REV 1.1 —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yea, Jeremy, that sums things up pretty well. Pure totalitarian, authoritarian, dictatorial, or despotic architectures certainly may happen to work out in the long run for communities like this, but that's not the plan here. Neither of course (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
