To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2626
2625  |  2627
Subject: 
Re: FA : Complete, Mint, MISB, MISP Soccers Sets & Sub-Sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:48:51 GMT
Viewed: 
353 times
  
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, "Scott-A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> writes:

FA : Complete Set & MISP & MISB LEGO Soccer Set Parts

All have start prices below $10
All have no reserve.

[snip!]

I have inserted a filter in the newsserver which helps Scott remember not to
post auction updates to groups like .market.buy-sell-trade and .build.
Unfortunately, the filter is rather broad -- it prevents Scott from posting
anything to those two groups.  However, Scott -was- reminded two weeks ago
that auction updates are not permitted in non-auction groups, and he -was-
also warned that repeated violations would result in suspension of posting
privileges.

Here is what Scott posted two weeks ago, followed by the reminder/warning:

   http://www.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=1026
   (Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:30:17 GMT)

   http://www.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=1032
   (Mon, 2 Aug 1999 19:05:09 GMT)

Earlier today, Scott posted an auction update to lugnet.build, followed five
minutes later by an apology:

   http://www.lugnet.com/build/?n=2174
   (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:43:18 GMT)

   http://www.lugnet.com/build/?n=2175
   (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:48:41 GMT)

The apology was followed one minute later by a second copy of the same
auction update (this time to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade), and that was
followed about an hour later with a second apology:

   http://www.lugnet.com/market/buy-sell-trade/?n=2280
   (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:49:47 GMT)

   http://www.lugnet.com/market/buy-sell-trade/?n=2281
   (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:43:23 GMT)

It is completely beyond me how someone could accidentally post an auction
update to two wrong groups in a row, especially with the second one
immediately following an apology for the first one (a clear admission of
understanding the rules).

If anyone feels that I am being too harsh, please let me know.

If anyone feels that I am being too lenient, please let me know.

--Todd



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: FA : Complete, Mint, MISB, MISP Soccers Sets & Sub-Sets
 
(...) [...] (...) No, IMO you're fine. You posted the warning which was obviously remembered by him twice. If he had inadvertantly posted through the web interface (and therefore couldn't cancel a post), he should have contacted you informing you of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: FA : Complete, Mint, MISB, MISP Soccers Sets & Sub-Sets
 
(...) Given the timing, no. It almost sounds deliberate - almost nose-thumbing deliberate. (...) Given the timing, who knows? (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: FA : Complete, Mint, MISB, MISP Soccers Sets & Sub-Sets
 
I've only just discovered that these events were up for debate, and this explains why I have not contributed to this discussion to date. Can I just make 3 points. RE : My post of 02.08.99 This was due to stupidity on my part. I simply did not (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR