Subject:
|
Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:35:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
498 times
|
| |
|
|
> >
> > I'm not sure I buy this. What value, exactly, does a signature bring? It
> > seems decorative, and the value is mostly to the appender being able to
> > make:
>
> Me neither. IMHO, having or not having a sig is a very personal choice, not
> a mandate by any stretch of the imagination. Probably only about half* of
> all the people on the net even use sigs.
>
> Personally, I don't use a sig because I find it much easier to read and
> digest people's posts quickly when they don't use sigs. While it's not
> really any of my business whether JW uses a sig, I'm perfectly happy that
> he doesn't.
Maybe someone can enlighten me, but I always considered
"--Todd"
to be the electronic equivalent of a "signature."
>
> > [...]
> > So while I agree that it may be annoying to not be responded to as to
> > why not when you ask that JW start using one, it just doesn't seem that
> > important to me, Certainly not one of the line items on a banishment
> > bill of particulars!!!
> > [...]
>
> Certainly not!
I agree here. It's the content of the posts, not the form, that really causes
upset.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
| (...) Me neither. IMHO, having or not having a sig is a very personal choice, not a mandate by any stretch of the imagination. Probably only about half* of all the people on the net even use sigs. Personally, I don't use a sig because I find it much (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
