Subject:
|
Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 21:53:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
491 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com>
writes:
> > > I'm not sure I buy this. What value, exactly, does a signature bring? It
> > > seems decorative, and the value is mostly to the appender being able to
> > > make:
> >
> > Me neither. IMHO, having or not having a sig is a very personal choice, not
> > a mandate by any stretch of the imagination. Probably only about half* of
> > all the people on the net even use sigs.
> >
> > Personally, I don't use a sig because I find it much easier to read and
> > digest people's posts quickly when they don't use sigs. While it's not
> > really any of my business whether JW uses a sig, I'm perfectly happy that
> > he doesn't.
>
>
> Maybe someone can enlighten me, but I always considered
> "--Todd"
> to be the electronic equivalent of a "signature."
Oh. OK, yeah, I guess in the context of news posts, it could be considered
an electronic equivalent of a real-life signature.
But I thought we were talking about sigs (a.k.a. signature files).
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
