 | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | I like this idea, but maybe two messages, one in the morning one in the evening. This way it makes it easier, because you can reply to things that came in during the night, and then to things that came in during the day. I think we ought to hold off (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —John Neal
|
| | | | | That sounds like a good idea because: 1) Jonathan is Jonathan. No matter how hard he tries, he will not be able to function in a mature manner in LUGNET because *HE IS IMMATURE* That's no crime, he's just young. And a little dense. But who among us (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Naji Norder
|
| | | | | | | I don't read most of the newsgroups that have complained, and so I don't feel it is my place to vote in the matter. However, as a suggestion, perhaps it would be more feasible to ban him from Lugnet and then see if he _VOLUNTARILY_ cleans up his (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) On the other hand, the other day, I saw Jonathan ask a reasonable question in a polite way. Someone else had already answered, but given the politeness of the question, I was willing to add a comment to the answer already given. I think the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Naji Norder
|
| | | | | | | | (...) feel (...) _VOLUNTARILY_ (...) his (...) he (...) shows: (...) but (...) way (...) use? (...) about (...) the (...) Agreed. Since I spoke up against him, here I'll speak up for him. He did ask nicely about the different Lego retailers in the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks for noticing, and thanks for the braces, which arrived today. I MEANT to leave them at your house, it wasn't an accident. All part of the master plan. Macaroni is staged for shipment. Also thanks for proving your imperfection by posting (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) Correct on all above. (Tim grovels at the feet of the great Lar) :P (...) Good point. Though I fully support the current vote, it appears that either way his actions will continue to back himself further into a corner. Personally his actions (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) He's said he would change before, in other ways, and hasn't. He apologized for his rudeness and said he wouldn't do it anymore a few days ago, then spent the last two days trying to defend a rude message he sent to Tore by arguing that since (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
