 | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | (...) mail folder I did) And that makes it OK? It was still extremely rude whether you sent it to Tore or posted it. It showed no respect for Tore at all. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail. The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) Wow, sounds a lot like "darn, I can't believe other people saw that and now I might be held accountable for it." Or in other words, "I'm sorry I got caught." (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) He actually took the time to answer my questions, therefore he does not consider the post rude and since it was meant only for his eyes that means that the opinions of the rest of the group as to the rudeness of the post do not matter as the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | (...) Tore (...) Agreed to all of Eric's above points. (...) Going solely by what Tore posted, no, he was not rude. Mercy triumphs over justice (but each has its place), so let's take these following points one at a time, not as a convoluted lump, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The message was posted by me. my newsreader seemed to stuff it up and post to .geek as well as mailing it to tore so the message was posted by me but it should never have been so therefore it should not have been seen by people on this group. (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) So because of some lacking on your part in technical skill or knowledge, which certainly comes as a surprise to everyone reading this, the message got posted to the group and everyone saw it. Deal with it. It's still rude, whether you INTENDED (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Wow, you must be REALLY frustrated with all this :-| (...) You're missing the entire point of what 80 million people have already told you, "But it WAS posted." You are basically saying, "Well, if I hadn't have posted it, people wouldn't have (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Though this last sentenced looks quoted, I assume that you Greg "author of zany sigs :-)" Majewski wrote it. I'm not frustrated like a lot of folks (for obvious reasons) but where the future of an individual with regard to a community is at (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) According to the NNTP headers in the message, it was posted by you to lugnet.off-topic.geek on Tuesday, August 3, 1999 at 11:16:38 GMT, from studun26.murdoch.edu.au, using Netscape 4.03 for Win95. Still baffled? (...) Apparently you posted it (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) Tore (...) Jonathan I just don't think you "get it". I have been giving this vote alot of thought and was inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt and vote for probation and take a "wait and see" approach. Now I am not so sure. When you (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Linc Smith
|
| | | | | | Hmmmm. I think there is already a vote being held to get Piggy. Maybe we might take a break for a while and wait until the results come out. I believe that JW's "defense" of his action started with the _statement_ (...) I did) most of the key (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | By the way, Linc, it's nice to hear from you. It seems like it's been a while. -John Van Linc Smith <ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca> wrote in message news:FGM8Fy.3EH@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Linc Smith
|
| | | | | | (...) while. (...) Summer is the field season, and I am not able to read/contribute as much as I would like. I have been around a day here and and a day there, but mostly lurking. Is it ever neat to have a close community like Lugnet that notices (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) No no no my friend. You cannot say in the least that your post was not rude or that it was cancelled out in effect by Tore's kind reply. Just because Tore himself didn't react at you doesn't mean it was rude. Posting mishaps happen, and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
